<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who needs social networks anyway?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/who-needs-social-networks-anyway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/who-needs-social-networks-anyway/</link>
	<description>favorites &#124; discovery &#124; ventures &#124; valuation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Facebook goes open &#171; Sampled + Sorted</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/who-needs-social-networks-anyway/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Facebook goes open &#171; Sampled + Sorted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 22:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/who-needs-social-networks-anyway/#comment-393</guid>
		<description>[...] goes&#160;open 28May07    The implications of this decision are huge and dovetail with some of my thoughts last fall. I&#8217;m excited to see an open network emerge, as both a consumer of social media and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] goes&nbsp;open 28May07    The implications of this decision are huge and dovetail with some of my thoughts last fall. I&#8217;m excited to see an open network emerge, as both a consumer of social media and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the meta-network arrives? &#171; Sampled + Sorted</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/who-needs-social-networks-anyway/#comment-94</link>
		<dc:creator>the meta-network arrives? &#171; Sampled + Sorted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Apr 2007 18:27:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/who-needs-social-networks-anyway/#comment-94</guid>
		<description>[...] meta-network&#160;arrives? 04Apr07    I wrote last fall about what I saw/see as the future of social media &#8212; namely, that everyone will have an online identity and primary profile, and various [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] meta-network&nbsp;arrives? 04Apr07    I wrote last fall about what I saw/see as the future of social media &#8212; namely, that everyone will have an online identity and primary profile, and various [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The social (meta) network &#171; Sampled + Sorted</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/who-needs-social-networks-anyway/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>The social (meta) network &#171; Sampled + Sorted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Dec 2006 09:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/who-needs-social-networks-anyway/#comment-41</guid>
		<description>[...] Fred Wilson at AVC has a good post about the role of MyBlogLog and Last.fm in enabling connections across social networks (though I think the former plays a more important role in doing so than the latter). As I&#8217;d discussed wrt to MyBlogLog back in October, I believe this is the future of social media. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Fred Wilson at AVC has a good post about the role of MyBlogLog and Last.fm in enabling connections across social networks (though I think the former plays a more important role in doing so than the latter). As I&#8217;d discussed wrt to MyBlogLog back in October, I believe this is the future of social media. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What is and isn&#8217;t Web 2.0? &#171; Sampled + Sorted</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/who-needs-social-networks-anyway/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>What is and isn&#8217;t Web 2.0? &#171; Sampled + Sorted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 10:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/who-needs-social-networks-anyway/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] My thoughts on the future of social networks from last Friday dovetail with this philosophy.&#160; However, I don&#8217;t think that YouTube and other web services that do not allow downloading are disqualified from upstanding Web 2.0 citizen status.&#160; In the case of YouTube, most folks have little need to do much else with the content.&#160; A viewer&#8217;s &#8220;marginal utility&#8221; from repeat viewings (assuming it&#8217;s not one&#8217;s own content) diminishes quickly, and a user can still readily share the video on his webpage, enabling discovery by others. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] My thoughts on the future of social networks from last Friday dovetail with this philosophy.&nbsp; However, I don&#8217;t think that YouTube and other web services that do not allow downloading are disqualified from upstanding Web 2.0 citizen status.&nbsp; In the case of YouTube, most folks have little need to do much else with the content.&nbsp; A viewer&#8217;s &#8220;marginal utility&#8221; from repeat viewings (assuming it&#8217;s not one&#8217;s own content) diminishes quickly, and a user can still readily share the video on his webpage, enabling discovery by others. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
