<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 reasons internet radio royalties suck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/03/07/5-reasons-internet-radio-royalties-suck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/03/07/5-reasons-internet-radio-royalties-suck/</link>
	<description>favorites &#124; discovery &#124; ventures &#124; valuation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Small &#38; innovative webcasters may live &#171; Sampled + Sorted</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/03/07/5-reasons-internet-radio-royalties-suck/#comment-783</link>
		<dc:creator>Small &#38; innovative webcasters may live &#171; Sampled + Sorted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 22:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/03/07/5-reasons-internet-radio-royalties-suck/#comment-783</guid>
		<description>[...] &amp; innovative webcasters may&#160;live 29Jun07    Of my 5 reasons internet royalties suck, SoundExchange has now offered to address #4 and 5 for webcasters, arguably the two most egregious [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &amp; innovative webcasters may&nbsp;live 29Jun07    Of my 5 reasons internet royalties suck, SoundExchange has now offered to address #4 and 5 for webcasters, arguably the two most egregious [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small &#38; innovative webcasters will die &#171; Sampled + Sorted</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/03/07/5-reasons-internet-radio-royalties-suck/#comment-637</link>
		<dc:creator>Small &#38; innovative webcasters will die &#171; Sampled + Sorted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jun 2007 07:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/03/07/5-reasons-internet-radio-royalties-suck/#comment-637</guid>
		<description>[...] webcasters will&#160;die 21Jun07    Some 3 1/2 months back I wrote a post entitled &#8220;5 reasons internet radio royalties suck&#8221; and I&#8217;ve not yet rounded out the 4th and 5th in the series so will do so [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] webcasters will&nbsp;die 21Jun07    Some 3 1/2 months back I wrote a post entitled &#8220;5 reasons internet radio royalties suck&#8221; and I&#8217;ve not yet rounded out the 4th and 5th in the series so will do so [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reason #3: Current rates are onerous, higher rates are fatal &#171; Sampled + Sorted</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/03/07/5-reasons-internet-radio-royalties-suck/#comment-138</link>
		<dc:creator>Reason #3: Current rates are onerous, higher rates are fatal &#171; Sampled + Sorted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 07:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/03/07/5-reasons-internet-radio-royalties-suck/#comment-138</guid>
		<description>[...] on a bit of a roll with posting this week so I&#8217;ll move on, at long last, to the 3rd of 5 reasons the new royalty rates suck. (As a side note, someone from Gizmodo nabbed my line but highlights 2 great points from Tim [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on a bit of a roll with posting this week so I&#8217;ll move on, at long last, to the 3rd of 5 reasons the new royalty rates suck. (As a side note, someone from Gizmodo nabbed my line but highlights 2 great points from Tim [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reason #2: Rates are WAY out of line with comps &#171; Sampled + Sorted</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/03/07/5-reasons-internet-radio-royalties-suck/#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Reason #2: Rates are WAY out of line with comps &#171; Sampled + Sorted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 09:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/03/07/5-reasons-internet-radio-royalties-suck/#comment-116</guid>
		<description>[...] #2: Rates are WAY out of line with&#160;comps 14Apr07    I&#8217;ve been remiss in outlining my 5 reasons why the proposed internet radio royalties for the &#8220;performance of a digital sound [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] #2: Rates are WAY out of line with&nbsp;comps 14Apr07    I&#8217;ve been remiss in outlining my 5 reasons why the proposed internet radio royalties for the &#8220;performance of a digital sound [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: station &#187; 5 reasons internet radio royalties suck</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/03/07/5-reasons-internet-radio-royalties-suck/#comment-80</link>
		<dc:creator>station &#187; 5 reasons internet radio royalties suck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2007 03:04:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/03/07/5-reasons-internet-radio-royalties-suck/#comment-80</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by davidporter [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by davidporter [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
