<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The top 20 social networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/the-top-20-social-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/the-top-20-social-networks/</link>
	<description>favorites &#124; discovery &#124; ventures &#124; valuation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: davidporter</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/the-top-20-social-networks/#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>davidporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/the-top-20-social-networks/#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Hi Kiran,

I&#039;ve blogged in past a bit about the first point - main thing in my mind is that people have an online identity.  Where they chose to have their &#039;homebase&#039; shouldn&#039;t matter and various widget/features should make a blog and a profile (or some combination in between as with Vox and Xanga, for example) not much different over time.

Good point re the relationship/dating networks.  If people use these profiles as their primary face online it could make sense.

I&#039;d not heard of cylive but will check it out (any relation to Cyworld?).  I&#039;ll add Tribe for sure, good catch.  I suppose Meetup makes sense too, esp if I&#039;ve included LinkedIn.

Thx!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Kiran,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve blogged in past a bit about the first point &#8211; main thing in my mind is that people have an online identity.  Where they chose to have their &#8216;homebase&#8217; shouldn&#8217;t matter and various widget/features should make a blog and a profile (or some combination in between as with Vox and Xanga, for example) not much different over time.</p>
<p>Good point re the relationship/dating networks.  If people use these profiles as their primary face online it could make sense.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d not heard of cylive but will check it out (any relation to Cyworld?).  I&#8217;ll add Tribe for sure, good catch.  I suppose Meetup makes sense too, esp if I&#8217;ve included LinkedIn.</p>
<p>Thx!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kbettadapur</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/the-top-20-social-networks/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>kbettadapur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/the-top-20-social-networks/#comment-150</guid>
		<description>&quot;I also think the distinction between blogs and social networks will lessen over time, but that’s another topic&quot; 

I find your view very interesting! Not sure if I agree with it. (But, if eventually that is how the market evolves, no skin off my back).

I also found that you have left out relationship networks (eHarmony etc.) from the list. I agree that relationship networking is a totally different genre.

But, I am surprised you did not include meetup (http://www.meetup.com), tribe (http://www.tribe.net) and cylive (http://www.cylive.com) in your list. Did you leave these out of the list for any specific reasons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I also think the distinction between blogs and social networks will lessen over time, but that’s another topic&#8221; </p>
<p>I find your view very interesting! Not sure if I agree with it. (But, if eventually that is how the market evolves, no skin off my back).</p>
<p>I also found that you have left out relationship networks (eHarmony etc.) from the list. I agree that relationship networking is a totally different genre.</p>
<p>But, I am surprised you did not include meetup (<a href="http://www.meetup.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.meetup.com</a>), tribe (<a href="http://www.tribe.net" rel="nofollow">http://www.tribe.net</a>) and cylive (<a href="http://www.cylive.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cylive.com</a>) in your list. Did you leave these out of the list for any specific reasons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidporter</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/the-top-20-social-networks/#comment-147</link>
		<dc:creator>davidporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 09:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2007/04/27/the-top-20-social-networks/#comment-147</guid>
		<description>Oops.  Forgot Friendster.  It&#039;s ranked just after Last.fm and before Piczo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.  Forgot Friendster.  It&#8217;s ranked just after Last.fm and before Piczo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
