Comments on: Top 25 music sites – March 2008 http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/06/top-25-music-sites-march-2008/ favorites | discovery | ventures | valuation Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:05:18 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: davidporter http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/06/top-25-music-sites-march-2008/#comment-3275 davidporter Wed, 30 Apr 2008 19:25:16 +0000 http://davidporter.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-3275 Some more sites to include next round: -- eMusic (don't know how I left them off) -- Skreemr -- Songza (forgot about them) -- Maestro.fm (recently launched) -- Grooveshark Some more sites to include next round:

– eMusic (don’t know how I left them off)
– Skreemr
– Songza (forgot about them)
– Maestro.fm (recently launched)
– Grooveshark

]]> By: davidporter http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/06/top-25-music-sites-march-2008/#comment-3256 davidporter Wed, 23 Apr 2008 16:49:28 +0000 http://davidporter.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-3256 Need to add Musicovery to this list also: http://siteanalytics.compete.com/musicovery.com/?metric=uv Need to add Musicovery to this list also: http://siteanalytics.compete.com/musicovery.com/?metric=uv

]]> By: bypassing http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/06/top-25-music-sites-march-2008/#comment-3254 bypassing Sun, 06 Apr 2008 20:54:29 +0000 http://davidporter.wordpress.com/?p=86#comment-3254 imeem's retoractive stats boost brings compete's stats in line with quantcast's. Last month imeem 'got quantified' and their user numbers tripled, it also showed that while 20 million users visited the site, another 80million saw an imeem player embedded somewhere else around the web. Anyway, as far as I'm aware there's no equivalent at compete so there's be no change in data collection for the site, only the data analysis. Someone at compete must have decided to change the way imeem was being scored, perhaps at the suggestion of imeem, or perhaps simply because the compete numbers were so different from other sources. Or maybe this is someone at compete playing a late April fools joke on you david? Then again I thought that muxtape was an april fools joke. imeem’s retoractive stats boost brings compete’s stats in line with quantcast’s. Last month imeem ‘got quantified’ and their user numbers tripled, it also showed that while 20 million users visited the site, another 80million saw an imeem player embedded somewhere else around the web.

Anyway, as far as I’m aware there’s no equivalent at compete so there’s be no change in data collection for the site, only the data analysis. Someone at compete must have decided to change the way imeem was being scored, perhaps at the suggestion of imeem, or perhaps simply because the compete numbers were so different from other sources.

Or maybe this is someone at compete playing a late April fools joke on you david?

Then again I thought that muxtape was an april fools joke.

]]>