<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 10 music sites &#8212; on &#8220;total attention&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/top-10-music-sites-this-time-on-total-attention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/top-10-music-sites-this-time-on-total-attention/</link>
	<description>favorites &#124; discovery &#124; ventures &#124; valuation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:05:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mike Lewis</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/top-10-music-sites-this-time-on-total-attention/#comment-3292</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 23:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/?p=90#comment-3292</guid>
		<description>most of qloud&#039;s traffics is inside social networks and thus not tracked</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>most of qloud&#8217;s traffics is inside social networks and thus not tracked</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidporter</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/top-10-music-sites-this-time-on-total-attention/#comment-3289</link>
		<dc:creator>davidporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 23:54:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/?p=90#comment-3289</guid>
		<description>Thanks Taylor!  

I suspect you&#039;re correct on that point.  Back at Live365, our numbers per any external metric (Arbitron, Comscore, etc) were always way less than our internal logs show.

Since I don&#039;t have access to private data, my hope is that all players are off by proportionate amounts.  I realize this may or may not be true, tho.

I also think Compete significantly understates Last.fm (since omits international users) and iLike (since omits widget-based access on FB and other social platforms).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Taylor!  </p>
<p>I suspect you&#8217;re correct on that point.  Back at Live365, our numbers per any external metric (Arbitron, Comscore, etc) were always way less than our internal logs show.</p>
<p>Since I don&#8217;t have access to private data, my hope is that all players are off by proportionate amounts.  I realize this may or may not be true, tho.</p>
<p>I also think Compete significantly understates Last.fm (since omits international users) and iLike (since omits widget-based access on FB and other social platforms).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gtmcknight</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/top-10-music-sites-this-time-on-total-attention/#comment-3287</link>
		<dc:creator>gtmcknight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2008 10:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/?p=90#comment-3287</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say your intuition is right, and those numbers are probably wildly wrong. I think Last.FM gets more pageviews then that and as a specific example, according to compete.com The Hype Machine would have 1.4 million pageviews (using your metric of visitors x pages/visit) but we are at about 8 million (so says Google Analytics).

I guess the real question is, are those numbers still accurate relative to each other or would there would be some major shifts in rank if you had access to real data.

Been enjoying your posts, thanks!

- Taylor McKnight</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say your intuition is right, and those numbers are probably wildly wrong. I think Last.FM gets more pageviews then that and as a specific example, according to compete.com The Hype Machine would have 1.4 million pageviews (using your metric of visitors x pages/visit) but we are at about 8 million (so says Google Analytics).</p>
<p>I guess the real question is, are those numbers still accurate relative to each other or would there would be some major shifts in rank if you had access to real data.</p>
<p>Been enjoying your posts, thanks!</p>
<p>- Taylor McKnight</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Project Playlist na mira da RIAA &#124; Remixtures</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/top-10-music-sites-this-time-on-total-attention/#comment-3272</link>
		<dc:creator>Project Playlist na mira da RIAA &#124; Remixtures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 22:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/?p=90#comment-3272</guid>
		<description>[...] Outra explicação poderá passar pelo facto do Playlist.com disponibilizar um widget para que os internautas possam ouvir as suas músicas a partir de uma página no MySpace ou no Facebook. Seja como for, o que é facto que o site não tem parado de crescer e a prova é que conta com mais de 24 milhões de utilizadores registados e é visitado por uma média de 600 mil pessoas por dia. Com 378 milhões de pageviews por mês, o Playlist só fica mesmo atrás do Imeem na lista dos 10 sites de música online mais visitados da Web, de acordo com David Porter. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Outra explicação poderá passar pelo facto do Playlist.com disponibilizar um widget para que os internautas possam ouvir as suas músicas a partir de uma página no MySpace ou no Facebook. Seja como for, o que é facto que o site não tem parado de crescer e a prova é que conta com mais de 24 milhões de utilizadores registados e é visitado por uma média de 600 mil pessoas por dia. Com 378 milhões de pageviews por mês, o Playlist só fica mesmo atrás do Imeem na lista dos 10 sites de música online mais visitados da Web, de acordo com David Porter. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 music sites &#124; TopTenCity.com</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/top-10-music-sites-this-time-on-total-attention/#comment-3271</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 music sites &#124; TopTenCity.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 04:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/?p=90#comment-3271</guid>
		<description>[...] Top 10 music sites &#8212; on &#8220;total attention&#8221; &#171; Sampled + Sorted [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Top 10 music sites &mdash; on &ldquo;total attention&rdquo; &laquo; Sampled + Sorted [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidporter</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/top-10-music-sites-this-time-on-total-attention/#comment-3269</link>
		<dc:creator>davidporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/?p=90#comment-3269</guid>
		<description>Good idea - I&#039;ll try Quantcast next time &#039;round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea &#8211; I&#8217;ll try Quantcast next time &#8217;round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bypassing</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/04/26/top-10-music-sites-this-time-on-total-attention/#comment-3268</link>
		<dc:creator>bypassing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 17:19:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/?p=90#comment-3268</guid>
		<description>Wow...
 so by this measure imeem is almost as big as the rest of the top 10 combined

Maybe you could use the data from quantcast as an alternative data source to compare against.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;<br />
 so by this measure imeem is almost as big as the rest of the top 10 combined</p>
<p>Maybe you could use the data from quantcast as an alternative data source to compare against.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
