<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 20 music sites &#8211; March 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/top-20-music-sites-march-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/top-20-music-sites-march-2008/</link>
	<description>favorites &#124; discovery &#124; ventures &#124; valuation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 16:48:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: davidporter</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/top-20-music-sites-march-2008/#comment-3283</link>
		<dc:creator>davidporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/?p=92#comment-3283</guid>
		<description>Ah got it - thx!  Look fwd to meeting you soon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah got it &#8211; thx!  Look fwd to meeting you soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucasgonze</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/top-20-music-sites-march-2008/#comment-3282</link>
		<dc:creator>lucasgonze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/?p=92#comment-3282</guid>
		<description>See 5/19 update on http://blog.wired.com/music/2008/05/imeem-unseats-y.html : &quot;ComScore&#039;s numbers contradict Compete&#039;s, showing that AOL Music in the top slot with 21.9 million visitors, Yahoo Music in second with nearly 20.8 million visitors and imeem in 11th.&quot;

It&#039;s a small world for internet music people, looking forward to running into you..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See 5/19 update on <a href="http://blog.wired.com/music/2008/05/imeem-unseats-y.html" rel="nofollow">http://blog.wired.com/music/2008/05/imeem-unseats-y.html</a> : &#8220;ComScore&#8217;s numbers contradict Compete&#8217;s, showing that AOL Music in the top slot with 21.9 million visitors, Yahoo Music in second with nearly 20.8 million visitors and imeem in 11th.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a small world for internet music people, looking forward to running into you..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidporter</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/top-20-music-sites-march-2008/#comment-3278</link>
		<dc:creator>davidporter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 04:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/?p=92#comment-3278</guid>
		<description>Lucas - interesting, I hadn&#039;t seen that.  I went back to the original URL but didn&#039;t see this.  Can you send URL?  

Btw, I enjoyed your post on SAI and I of course recall you from Webjay.  We must meet sometime!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucas &#8211; interesting, I hadn&#8217;t seen that.  I went back to the original URL but didn&#8217;t see this.  Can you send URL?  </p>
<p>Btw, I enjoyed your post on SAI and I of course recall you from Webjay.  We must meet sometime!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lucasgonze</title>
		<link>http://davidporter.wordpress.com/2008/05/14/top-20-music-sites-march-2008/#comment-3277</link>
		<dc:creator>lucasgonze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 04:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidporter.wordpress.com/?p=92#comment-3277</guid>
		<description>Note that after fixing the data imeem is 11th in uniques, aol is 1st and y! is 2nd.  This is a huge difference, though the correction has been much less newsworthy than the initial incorrect story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note that after fixing the data imeem is 11th in uniques, aol is 1st and y! is 2nd.  This is a huge difference, though the correction has been much less newsworthy than the initial incorrect story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
